Showing posts with label Starvix Draxon's Dream World. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Starvix Draxon's Dream World. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Maleficent Film Review

I went to see Maleficent a couple of days ago.  This will be my review on the film.  Overall I enjoyed the film.  The visuals were stunning, incredibly detailed and beautiful.  The costuming was absolutely superb, especially Maleficent's costume.  The acting was excellent, especially Angelina Jolie. 

My thoughts on the storyline however, are indeed a bit jumbled.  I thought their take on the storyline was very well thought out.  However the film seemed to move quick.  It's something I've noticed lately with Fantasy films.  They seem to be all action and no reflection.  I will have to see how the How to Train Your Dragon sequel fairs.  Nonetheless it felt a little fast paced.

Now I'm one of those people who usually like the original better.  I won't spoil anything.  Well I have to almost because the ending was interesting.  So SPOILER ALERT, Maleficent lives and no longer is evil.  It was all King Stephan.  The curse breaks when Maleficent feels guilty about cursing Aurora and wishes for forgiveness. 

There is an interesting aspect to this conclusion.  What it does is it prevents a simple message from spreading.  The kiss of true love.  Feminists will love this, or anyone who wants to be strong.  This is not an insult, it's just something I figured.  It deconstructs the message that women need men in order to be saved, aka, the kiss of true love.  Another scene that fosters a more masculine greed is that Stephan steals Maleficent's wings for sake of power.  Maleficent ends the fight between the two near the end of the film.  He tries to finish it and in the end plummets to his death. 

The character Diaval was very interesting.  I like how whatever he transformed into be it wolf or dragon had a crow like look to it.  Perhaps this is why I am forgiving that the dragon did not have four limbs and two wings.  Believe me, I was not the least bit pleased about that.  However, I can overlook it.  The dragon was cute though.  Very well done, despite that- oh whatever!

I guess my ultimate conflict is that I'm not sure how to feel about the ending.  Maleficent is probably, other than Chernobog, the most terrifying and most evil of all the Disney villains.  Ursula and Jafar come close, but not nearly as close.  Maleficent is a subtle villain.  Though I love the complexity of how Maleficent became evil, I thought that the ending of her turning good took away from that concept we have of her as a villain.  At the same time I think it works for this interpretation and story.  I always knew she was a fairy, but I sort of wanted to explore who her parents were.  I always figured her father was a dragon, probably because of the horns.  Then again I've seen drawings of fairies with horns... I think. 

In the end I think the movie was well done and contained elements that bear witness to the original film.  Despite its minor conflictions with the original, example: the dragon in the original had four limbs and two wings and was Maleficent, I still think that film performed excellently and that everyone should at least go to see it.  I give it 8 out of 10 dragon points.  

That's it for this review.  Find more in my blog.  Keep reading everyone. 

Starvix Draxon

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Why we read Harry Potter

I was bothered by something a friend of my friend said one day.  He criticized the seventh book of Harry Potter for having silly plot errors on the horcruxes, and the sudden emergence of deathly hallows being so unnecessary, and how it took away from the story. 

Personally I think that's ridiculous for two reasons. 1) It actually works out just fine.  2) That's not why we read Harry Potter. 

What I mean by that is literally that's not why we read Harry Potter.  We don't read Harry Potter just because of magic and plot, and the semantics of magic and plot, and how magic works.  That was what that friend was talking about.  The friend was criticizing the magic system.  That was his justification of criticizing the final installment of the Harry Potter series. 

Believe me when I say that is not how to critique a Fantasy book.  It really isn't.  It's a disgrace.  The ones who analyze and attempt logicize the magic system are the ones who are ignoring everything else that's far more important.  If they keep it up, they'll be asking questions like, "Well how does Voldemort use the killing curse?"  You have to mean it, says Mad Eye Moody book four. 

"But how do you mean it?" We can't tell you because we don't know.  J.K. Rowling probably doesn't know it either.  It's magic.  It's not supposed to make sense. 

"But why didn't Sirius Black use Protego on Bellatrix Lestrange's Curse Reducto that shoved him into the wall?" I don't know!  Timing?  If we keep asking these questions, we'll begin to wonder how does Harry manage to learn a Patronus faster than everyone else, why does everyone else struggle with spells and then suddenly are magically able to perform them when thrown into the action?  How does it work?  How does all this magic work?  If we knew how magic works, it wouldn't be magic...It would be science.  And that's a problem right there.  It's magic...It can't be logicized.  If we try to argue that then it looks as if the author is breaking their own magic rules.  But here's the catch.  The author has to break these rules in order to tell a story. 

J.K. Rowling has to tell a story.  Though the uniqueness of the magic in Harry Potter plays a role, the magic isn't the only reason why we read Harry Potter.  We read Harry Potter because of the uniqueness of the setting.  Diagon Alley's many shops can be related to the many pedestrian zones found in Europe, littered with small kiosks, flowershops, jewelry stores, and more.  The Daily Prophet is a newspaper, much like our own.  Hogwarts itself is relatable to children because it's school.  It just teaches magic.  But everything else, classes, lunch periods, library studying, classrooms, lessons, and everything are all relatable.  Quiditch is very much like football.  The foods are full of variety and uniqueness.  The features of Harry Potter's world are relatable in some way or another to our own.  It is the invention of J.K. Rowling's mind, the uniqueness of vivid detailed imagery and creative play, the details within the setting that give life to the world of Harry Potter. 

It is also the characters.  All the characters, even the minor ones, have some unique complexity to them or at least a personality aspect that make them come alive.  Rowling's dialogue comes alive in many unique ways that bring complexity and life to the characters.  She gives them unique names, something that Dickens would do.  She creates lines of dialogue that fit each character perfectly.  She captures real emotions and real feelings and real personalities that exist in our everyday world and she does it so with a high vocabulary. 

This is why I think J.K. Rowling is neither a children's writer nor an adult writer.  Though her intended audience is children, she speaks to a thousand voices who grew up with her works both young and old.  Her vocabulary and sentence structure far exceeds your average teen adventure novel and paranormal romance.  Her story is paced not at thriller pace but rather a calm detailed joyous pace that takes pleasure in the details and complexities of the real world.  Her works speak of crucial themes that children and even in away adults go through every day of their life.  Love is a crucial theme, love and how evil is in fact created not born with.  There are so many possibilities to analyze Harry Potter.  We should start treating this great series with a little bit more respect.  If we follow the guidelines that I have set forth here, perhaps we might be able to start taking Fantasy Literature a little more seriously. 

And on that note, that ends this post.  This is a mere summary of an idea I intend to work with, therefore, hands off to everyone else.  This copyright is enforced by the Draxon Industry.  If you break this, you will be haunted by dragons and werewolves for the rest of your life! Ha, ha!

Keep reading everyone!

Starvix Draxon

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Contemporary American Fiction

So I took a class on Contemporary American Fiction at the University of Houston taught by a really good English Professor, who is an amazing lecturer and teacher.  I really enjoyed listening to what he had to say. 
 
Anyway.  You're probably wondering, what books did I read.  To that I will list the books in the following order that we read them in. 
 
1) White Noise by Don Dellilo
2) New York Trilogy by Paul Auster
3) Music For Torching by A. M. Holmes
4) Catfish and Mandala by Andrew Pham
5) Jesus Saves by Darcey Steinke
6) Fight Club by Chuck Palaniuk
7) Lost in the City by Edward P. Jones
8) In Persuasion Nation by George Saunders
9) 10:01 by Lance Olsen
10) AVA by Carol Maso
 
My favorites are New York Trilogy, Fight Club, and 10:01.  Sometimes In Persuasion Nation and AVA are in my favorites.

You're probably wondering, what is Contemporary American Fiction.  In order to define that we need to ask ourselves another question: What is postmodern literature?

To tell you the truth, I'm still trying to figure it out, because there seem to be various definitions in how to define it and none of it is consistent.  Basically what my professor taught us is that postmodern literature basically:

1) Deals with the problems of consumer culture
2) Deals with the problems of media and hyperreality. 
3) Deals with the grand narrative and how we cannot have one truth but many truths
4) Deals with the concept of chance rather than determined fate of events
5) Deals with the idea of an unresolved ending, unresolved question, just merely ends

That's the basics of it.  I hope I haven't misinterpreted what he has told me.  Very interesting concept and all.  If you apply these definitions to the books listed above and read closely you will see those hidden concepts emerge from the text.  Each book is unique unto itself and I highly recommend reading my favorites. 

I like New York Trilogy because of the language.  It takes the New York mystery story and takes it somewhere entirely else, on a road of language, religion, and unresolved story matters. 

Fight Club deals with the idea of the loss of masculinity inside a consumer culture.  In a desire to escape the repetitive boring feminine system society as created, the two main characters create a Fight Club to feel the surge of masculine bravado, only to create another system, one that it is in fact militaristic and brainwashing.  You'll like the twist near the end, I won't spoil it. 

10:01 is a series of vignettes, short little moments in the first ten minutes of the movie theater.  Each vignettes enters inside each movie goer's head, each stylistically different, sometimes so surreal.  One vignette even enters the screenplay formatting into one characters mind blurring the boundaries between screenplay and Fiction. 

Well that's it for now.  I'll talk more about these books at another time and go more in depth into their messages.  For now, I need to do some homework.  Keep reading everyone. 

Starvix Draxon 

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Beautiful Creatures Movie Review

So I saw the Beautiful Creatures movie.  I had started to read the book but never finished because I got tired of the basic language utilized in that book. I read the comic that came out as well.  The internal thought made no sense at all.  But this is about the movie.  Overall I thought it was well done and followed the book generally speaking.  The actor's performances were excellent and convincing.  The emotion I felt was real, at some points weaker than others, but ultimately real.  I thought the graphics were well done and interesting.  I felt like some scenes were so short and rushed, but that's what happens in an adaptation.  Overall I think it deserves a good four stars.  That's all I have to say about it really.  That's it for today I guess.  Keep reading everyone. 

Starvix Draxon

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Wepwawet: Egyptian Wolf God of War?!

That's right, Folks!  There is an actual wolf god in Egyptian mythology.  At one time there were probably wolves in Egypt and there still might be today.  I don't know for certain.  His name is...you're gonna laugh at this. 
 
Wepawet!  Get it?  We-paw-wet. 
 
Anyway.  It is common that he symbolized war.  However because of his symbolization for war, he began to symbolize death along with it, and soon became a funerary god much similar to the functions of Anubis.  Eventually the two became Anubis himself it seems.  His cult city is located in the city of Lycopolis in Egypt.  Interesting how the Greeks named that city.  Now we know where the word lycanthropy comes from. 
 
But now that I know Wepawet exists, it's time to start
 
THE ANUBIS WEPAWET BROTHER CONSPIRACY!!!!!!
 
This was some interesting Egyptian mythology trivia wasn't it.  I hope you enjoyed it.  Also note that if you research him, you're going to get different versions on what Wepawet really is.  Research him and Anubis and I gaurantee you will find more than one version and role and birth of that god.  Well that's all for this post.  Take care everyone!
 
May the gods of Egypt be with you all!
 
Starvix Draxon

Anubis: God of Embalment and Death

I wanted to write this post to give some trivia on my favorite Egyptian god other than Ra.  He is my favorite god because he's part jackal.  It reminds me of werewolves and all.  Okay, here is the trivia along with an image of Anubis. 
 

Did you know Anubis's real name is Anupu or Anpu?  Yep.  Anubis is actually the greek version of his true name.  Most call him Anubis since it matches with the jackal god and it actually sounds really cool. 
 
Did you know that there are three stories as to how Anubis was born?  That's right.  There are indeed three stories to his birth.  Rick Riordan's little field guide is incorrect.  E.A. Wallace Budge, a famous British Egyptologist also speaks of what I'm saying.  If you think about it, the fact that there are three stories makes sense.  The Egyptian Mythology is full of holes and inconsistencies because of its long age.  The most popular myth is where Nephthys, Anubis's mother and sister of Isis, got Osiris drunk and impregnated her (nauty, nauthy) with Anubis.  My personal favorite is Nephthys is married to Set the god of war and chaos with the head of some unknown creature that has yet to be discovered.  I like that version because of  Set's animal head.  If one thinks about it, Set's bestial head and Nephthys's motherly tranquility create Anubis who is bestial yet calm and server to the dead.  The other very interesting myth of Anubis's birth, is that he is a child of Ra.  Now if you think about it, the bennu feather, the feather of a phoenix could be a symbol of Ra.  Anubis is the weigher of the scales, where the heart is placed to see if the person is worthy of paradies or not.  Such a role would be given by a god of light to one of his children.  The question now is, which one is correct?  Who knows?  There are probably many different versions of his birth that I haven't even heard of. 
 
There will be one more trivia but I want to make it an interesting post.  I also have to make sure this particular god is real.  Get ready for some more Egyptian Trivia. 
 
Starvix Draxon
 

Friday, January 18, 2013

Something New

Hello, everyone.  I'm going to start doing some new things today.  I'm going to start publishing stories on my blog.  They are mine and no one else's.  I also might start posting some of my artwork, though I don't think it's any good.  I'll just post little pieces of short flash fiction and see what you guys think of it.  I hope you will all like it.  Farewell. 
 
Starvix Draxon

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Raksura: The Cloud Roads Review

The Cloud Roads is an excellent book if you like a good read.  It tells of the man called Moon a person who can shift into a winged creature, called a Raksura.  He searches to find out who he is and eventually gives up, constanly being kicked out tribe after tribe because his Raksura form looks like a fell creature.  He eventually finds out what he is, and joins the Raksura tribe, but still feels out of place because many want him gone.  The story is all about find where one belongs, a place to call home.  I completely related to the character Moon as I too sometimes felt out of place in grade school and middle school until I found my place in the theater. 
 
 
So that aspect of the book is really good.  The description wasn't too much although I would have liked to have seen greater detail on some of the land based creatures that were just sort of referenced.  I had trouble telling which character was which due to their names.  Something you really have to be careful with is character names and making sure you clearly describe what they look like.  I do think there were too many characters to keep the names straight.  Some parts felt a little bland.  I did think that the story seemed to go on and on at a moment but I think it was a nice length.  I did want to see more conflict.  I felt Moon's change of belonging felt too quick and would have loved to see more resistance, more conflict, more drama.  The author was doing a really good job of it and then she made certain things happen that I wouldn't have done.  I do think, however, this is a good book, and if any of you out there are looking for something to read, I reccomend The Cloud Roads, for it is sweet and heart warming, even though there are a couple of minor cons.  I give it some where between a three and a four star. It is also a seriew with two other books.  Keep reading everyone!
 
,Starvix Draxon

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

The Hobbit Movie Review

On Friday I went to see the Hobbit movie.  By this point I have read up to the events in Mirkwood so I knew I had read up to what the movie had covered.  So I will be comparing the movie to the book as I write this. 
 
Question 1. Which was better?  Book or Movie?
 
Answer:  Movie!  Deffinately!
 
Question 2.  Was the movie accurate to the book?
 
Answer:  Yes, though there were some differences, but those differences were really good and added more depth to the story

Question 3.  What kind of differences?

Answer: The movie included more exposition about a war between orcs and the dwarves at Moria that happened a while back.  The group is actually chased by the orcs a couple of times.  Also the character is far more developed than in the book. 

Something that is sort of my pet peeve is weak characters.  If a story is just exposition and more exposition, then I get bored quickly.  I love character.  To me, character is the most important aspect of the story.  Without it, you have nothing but exposition.  That's why I don't typically care for Tolkein's work, because 1, his language is difficult to understand, and 2, he includes so much exposition about the rings and other stuff that he loses the chance to develop characters.  I'm not saying he's a bad writer.  He's an exellent author, but not the best story teller for character. 

Question 4.  Was the acting good?

Answer:  Yes!  Peter Jackson cast really good actors for The Hobbit.  I don't know anyone else who could have played Bilbo as well as Martin Freeman.  He really nailed the character down really well. 

Question 5.  Was the ending solid?

Answer:  Yes.  Peter Jackson chose a perfect stopping point to end his film.  It ends on a good note and leaves one waiting for the next film. 

Question 6.  What are you excited for? 

Answer:  I'm excited to see Benedict Cumberbatch play Smaug.  He literally is doing body scan imaging like they did with Gollum, so I'm really excited to see how they're going to do that with a dragon.  I also can't wait to see the Necromancer in action.  I mean they have to do something to explain the third movie.  I also have to finish the book.  Hopefully I'll finish it soon. 

Well, that's all.  I'm really excited for the next film.  I hope everyone gets a chance to see it.  Keep reading my friends. 

,Starvix Draxon
 

Friday, December 14, 2012

Mark of Athena Review

Well, I don't have much to say about this story.  It was utterly awesome!  Rick Riordan has done his job once again.  It was very fun to read.  I loved the cliffhanger.  I'm dying to find out what happens next.  Riordan sure knows how to keep his reader's attention.  Well, that's really all I have to say.  Keep reading everyone!
 
,Starvix Draxon

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Wereworld: Nest of Serpents Release Date

I just now found out that Wereworld: Nest of Serpents, book four of the Wereworld series is scheduled to come out January 15th 2013.  I'm so excited!  I don't have to wait a whole like I did with Rage of the Lion.  Keep reading, my friends. 
 
,Starvix Draxon

Monday, November 26, 2012

Kane Chronicles Review

As a fan of Rick Riordan, I love the fact that he wrote the Kane Chronicles.  Egyptian mythology is my absolute favorite mythology.  However, I do have a few things to say about it. 
 
Overall, I love the series.  My favorite part is the Sadie and Anubis romance.  I thought that was very romantic.  Anubis, for shame, you're acting like a Greek god.  The romance between Carter and Zia was also romantic.  Overall the story covered the basics of Egyptian mythology, definitely incorporated the culture of Egypt.  However, there are a few criticisms I have for the series. 
 
First criticism, I didn't like his interpretation of the Egyptian gods.  What I love about Egyptian mythology is the animal heads.  The gods who are human and animal to me represent man and nature as one.  So when Rick Riordan gives them human heads instead of their animal heads, that really ticked me off.  He should have kept the animal heads.  For example, Horus should have had a falcon head, Anubis should have shown of his jackal head, Set should have had his Set-animal head, and Ra should not have been a muscular grandpa.  If Rick Riordan truly wanted to produce the cycle of rebirth for Ra, he should have made him younger, and have his head the shape of a phoenix/falcon/dragon.  I say dragon because of a slight bias from the Yu-gi-oh card Winged Dragon of Ra.  But it would at least set the difference between Ra and Horus. 
 
Another thing is that the book does not mention and include every Egyptian god or myth.  I can understand some of this partly because the mythology itself is old, scattered, and partially destroyed.  But still, he could have atleast added Aten, the solar disk that sits upon Ra's head.  He could have even added Wepawet, Anubis's brother, the wolf god of war.  Yes that is a real god, I did my research.  He's often mistaken for Anubis for some reason.  That would have been cool to add Wepawet to the story.  It might have added a lot of character development for Anubis.  And then he also forgot that Maa't was also a goddess of order.  I always wondered why he didn't include that. Also in the Egyptian guide book that was later published, it says that Anubis's father is actually Osiris rather than Set, based on the myth of Nephthys getting Osiris drunk and impregnating her and Set getting really angry at her.  In actuality, Rick Riordan is right about Set being Anubis's father.  There are actually three myths to the way Anubis was born.  One is the more popular Osiris myth, the other his Set, the third is actually that he is the son of Ra.  Personally I think that Set makes more sense than the other two. 
 
The last thing I have to say about the Kane Chronicles is that the stories were good.  It could have been better.  I think Rick Riordan could have researched the mythology a bit more, search for the myths in Egypt and maybe work on his grammar.  Often times I felt that the story was rushed, and I also felt that the sentence wording could have been improved.  To me, Riordan clearly knows his Greek and Roman mythology better than Egyptian.  Like I said, the series was good.  It could have been better.  I still rate a four star because I really loved it, my criticisms were minor preferences, and I'm a sucker for Egyptian mythology. 
 
That's all I have to say for right now.  I also want to make an announcement.  I am in the process of reading Mark of Athena.  I hope to be finished soon, but it might be awhile before I write a review on that book due to Finals in college. 
 
I hope you all learned a little mythology from me.  All I have to say now is well...Keep reading my friends. 
 
,Starvix Draxon

Thursday, November 22, 2012

Kingdom Hearts 1.5 HD Update

Kingdom Hearts 1.5 HD, according to KH Insider, is 80-90% complete.  Yay.  The next question is when is it coming to America?  That's all I have for news.  Stay informed.
 
,Starvix Draxon

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Sherlock and The Hobbit

For all you Sherlock fans, here's something that might interest you.  Bilbo Baggins in the latest upcoming the Hobbit movie is played by Martin Freeman, who plays Dr. Watson in Sherlock.  Benedict Cumberbatch, who plays Sherlock Holmes, will be voicing Smaug, and playing a roll called the Necromancer.  If you are a J.R.R.Tolkein fan, and you know exactly what this character is, please let me know.  All I know is that when I clicked on the Necromancer, on imdb, it took me to Sauron's page.  I've been reading The Hobbit, and so far I have not seen a character called the Necromancer.  Either way I find it interesting that those two actors are in the same movie.  Stay informed my friends. 
 
,Starvix Draxon

Monday, November 19, 2012

Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII

Take a look at the Final Fantasy XIII website.  Here it shows four videos describing the new video game, Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII.
 
 
 

Kingdom Hearts: Cards vs Command Deck

Check out this neat article on Kingdom Hearts card and command deck system.  The article discusses the evolution of the game's battle system, from cards to commands.  It's short, but I found it interesting. 
 
 
 

Wereworld: Shadow of the Hawk Review

Okay, I'm going to go ahead and give a quick critique of the book and the series as a hole.  I want to point out some good qualities about the series and qualities that the story lacks.  WARNING!  May contain spoilers!
 
In Wereworld: Rise of the Wolf, Drew discovers that he is a werewolf and rightful king of Lyssia in the seven realms.  The story has good character development, develops Hector as a kind young boar lord willing to aid Drew in anyway even it means using the forbiden art of necromancy.  We also meet Gretchen, the werefox, how she starts off as a selfish noble and ends with a changed personality, far more kind and friendly.  All in all, the first book was really great. 
 
Then comes book two and three, Rage of the Lion, and Shadow of the Hawk.  Note that I have not finished book three, but I've read enough to where I have to give a review now.  In Rage of the Lion, Drew attempts to rescue Gretchen, while trying to escape his fate as king of Lyssia.  I will say when I read that, I thought at first cliche, but then I argued that it made sense that someone like Drew would not want to be king.  However, I felt it could have been better, made more convincing.  Near the end of Rage of the Lions, Drew accepts his fate as king after escaping his fate of being mauled by undead corpses, only to be boared onto a ship, enslaved by the weregoat Kesslar.  Why does Drew suddenly accept his fate as king.  I for one thought that resolution was rather rushed.  I needed a bit more story than a bunch of action scenes to be convinced that he grew to accept his fate as rightful king of Lyssia.  If I was in Drew's predicament, I would need more than the severing of my own paw to get me to accept my fate as king.  So far in Shadow of the Hawk, Drew has accepted his fate and seems more noble, but his character seems a little flat.  He talks and persuades people like his father would, but he does not seem to be in turmoil.  Perhaps Drew's determined to suceed in his quest to free the people of Lyssia from the vile catlords from Bast.  He might be a better character now in the third book, but I still need to be convinced. 
 
Hector, on the other hand, is an example of a great character.  Curtis Jobling clearly put more effort into developing Hector's character.  As we know in Rise of the Wolf, Hector is a kind young boarlord.  Once we get into book two, Rage of the Lions, we see the effects of his necromancy take its toll on him.  He begins to see creatures called viles.  We see him slowly deteriorate.  Duke Bergan, the werebear, and the rest of the wolf council find out about his necromancy and strip his membership of the wolf council.  Then along comes his brother Vincent, who caused their father's death, as well as bankrupted their city.  Vincent proceeds to blackmail his brother's necromancy in exchange for the title of their city.  If Hector refuses, he will tell the people of his necromancy, that may as well cause the people to revolt against the wolf.  The conflict between the two brothers escalates, and Hector shoves his brother over a railing and falls to his death.  Vincent's soul becomes a vile and torments Hector.  Count Vega, the wereshark, helps conceal his brother's fate.  As the story continues, the Wolf Council is forced to flee the invading forces of the Catlords.  Hector by then has discovered the ability to control the vile and make it do his bidding by harming others.  By then I've already had an idea that Hector was going to turn evil.  My suspicions were confirmed in Shadow of the Hawk. 
 
Hector further deteriorates, using his ability even more.  He also leads the members of the Wolf Council to an unknown spot of land, where he hears a voice calling to him, he finds a creature who says he can learn more about necromancy and Hector willingly let's the creature embrace him.  Count Vega rescues him as the group is attacked by dead bodies.  Hector later hallucinates, grabs Bethwyn, a lady in waiting for Queen Amelie, Drew's mother, and calls her "Gretchen" He talks to her as if she was Gretchen saying, "I dreamed it was you.  So caring and kind.  I was in such a dark place, Gretchen, so cold and alone.  And you were the warmth I could cling to.  It was your light that brought me back from the darkness.  It was your love,"  Now why he says that, I have no idea.  Could he be in a trance that has to do with Lucas, the young werelion who was in love with Gretchen, fated to have a dark fate?  What does that mean?  I have yet to figure out.  Eventually Vega threatens Hector or he'll spill the truth about Vincent's death.  At that point, Hector murders Vega and throws him overboard.  Hector is then tricked into leaving the ship, when the rest of the Wolf council finds out the truth about what he has done.  He resolves to betray his friends, believing they've betrayed him.  He goes to Slotha the werewalwrus and journeys back to Highcliff where the Lucas the werelion threatens to kill him, until Hector demonstrates his necromancy abilities by murdering Slotha.  Hector, believing Drew to be dead, and the wolf council having betayed him, he allies himself with the Catlords.  Little does he know that Drew is still alive.  The ratlords take him to the dead skull of Vankaskan where he robs the vile soul of its knowledge of necromancy.  Throughout the two books the black spot on Hector's hand, created in the first book, has consumed his entire hand by this point, withered and mumified. 
 
Hector reminds me of Morgana.  If you have watched the British TV show, Merlin, then you know what I'm talking about.  Morgana starts off as one of the good guys.  In season two her alliances slowly shift.  By season three she has shifted alliances and tries to destroy camelot. 
 
The next point I'd like to make about the story is Curtis Jobling's character abuse.  By character abuse I mean the constant introducing and disposing of characters throughout the series.  In Book two we meet Brogan, Duke Bergan's son.  He's in the book only for a short time, before he's killed, later zombified into an undead corpse by Vankaskan.  In Book three, we meet Drake, werecrocodile, who sides with Drew, however, he dies in the very first battle they fight together.  Jobling also kills, Bergan, Mikkel, Leopold,(by his own son.  Everyone seems to claim Bergan killed him.  Probably a cover-up story), and various other characters that I cannot think of, because I haven't finished reading Shadow of the Hawk. 
 
So far, my opinion of the third book is unconfirmed, rather mixed.  My conclusions so far, is that Curtis Jobling lacks in character development and character usage.  However, through the bloody action scenes and his discription, Curtis Jobling does illustrate the medieval time period rather acurately.  Have I studied medieval history?  No.  Do I know a little bit about medieval history?  Yes.  I know that our society today is far more secure than it was back then.  I can tell, the Jobling did his research on the time period.  I think that's what his book really is, an illustration of the back stapping, slave selling, alliance forming, kingdoms waring, medieval ages.  I want to finish the book series.  I really do.  I want to find out how Drew's going to handle Hector's betrayal.  I wonder how Hector's going to handle the fact that Drew's alive.  I bet the British know already, and I'm sitting here wasting my time writing a critique, and questions that have probably already been answered in the United Kingdom, while desperately waiting for the fourth book to come out in America.  I am almost tempted to by the U.K copy.  But alas, I have to wait.  That's why hesitate reading the third book.  If Curtis Jobling ends with another painful cliffhanger, I'm going to scream and throw the book across the house.  He knows how to keep one interested, that's for sure.  He's a clever author. 
 
Well, that's all I have to say for today.  Remember, you can find Shadow of the Hawk and the other two books in the children's section at your local Barnes and Noble book store.  Keep reading my friends. 
 
,Starvix Draxon
 
 
 

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Wings of Fire: The Lost Heir Release Date

Hey, everyone!  I've got news that I've been harboring for a while.  Wings of Fire: The Lost Heir comes out January 1st 2013!  Yay.  I was really excited when I finished the first book.  The book had one of those cliffhanger moments that leaves you wondering what will happen next.  I thouroughly enjoyed the first book, so I'm expecting an equally if not better well told story.  Here is a picture of the cover. 
 
 

Friday, November 9, 2012

Malificent

 
Fellow Fairy Tale fans, I'm pleased to announce that we have a new fairy tale film coming out March fourteenth 2014 called Malificent.  This story is told from the perspective of the evil witch, Malificent, who lays the sleeping curse upon Princess Aurora, a.k.a Sleeping Beauty.  Angelina Jolie stars as Malificent.  Elle Fanning plays as Princess Aurora.  Here is a promo picture. 
 
 
 
 
 

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

New Characters for Once Upon A Time

I've just looked at the Once Upon a time wiki and have a little update on characters we intend to see in further episodes.  It appears that one of the characters is, just as I thought, the little mermaid.  I had a feeling because of something Regina said in Skin Deep, something about a mermaid.  So we will find out sometime in season two just what Ariel is going to play a role in. 
 
On the list is also Aladdin and Jafar, so we'll be seeing an Arabian Knights tail.  Sadly there is nothing said about them. 
 
We also have a character called Barret who described by the wiki as, "A major recurring guest star role with an option for next season is being cast. A character named Barrett. He's in his 30s, kind and smart, but also has a very dark side and has beliefs and a way of life that he will fight fiercely to defend."
 
We also have a character called Gerhardt, who currently has no bio on him yet.  I'm not even sure if he's a fairy tale character.  He might be, but sadly I only know common fairy tales.  We will just have to wait and see. 
 
I for one loved the Tallahassee episode.  I noticed that Princess Aurora had the same dream as Henry, but that the difference was that the mysterious figure in the dream was different.  In Aurora's dream it was male, but in Henry's dream, it was a female.  What could this mean?  Is it possibly a new villain maybe even worse than Cora?  We will have to wait and find out.  So that's all the announcements I have for Once Upon A Time.  Keep tuning in and we might have more updates.